[2025:RJ-JP:37259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11770/2025 Alok Yadav S/o Shivkumar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Huseelpur, Panchayat Salarpur, Tehsil Tijara, Ps. Khuskheda, District Alwar At Present Tenant Near Hotel Nesta, Sector-8, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Meena Mr. Bhupesh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.316/2025 registered at Police Station Sodala, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 127(2) & 140(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that false averments have been made in the FIR and version has been exaggerated in the FIR. Counsel submits that there was dispute between the parties with regard to the fair of taxi. It is submitted that other co-accused persons namely Manoj Yadav and Dilip [2025:RJ-JP:37259] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11770/2025] Singh Gaud have been granted benefit of bail by this court. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the material made available before me in the form of case diary and the fact that aforementioned co-accused persons have been granted bail by this court; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Alok Yadav S/o Shivkumar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to [2025:RJ-JP:37259] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11770/2025] which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /41