[2025:RJ-JP:14317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20113/2017 Tikaram Meena S/o Bholaram Meena, R/o Village And Post Chan- dera, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Home Depart- ment, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur. 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur. 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur. 6. The District Elementary Education Officer, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prkash Mathur, AAG Ms. Sara Parveen for R-5 Ms. Krishma Soni for Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2025 In backdrop of the order dated 26.03.2025, it is submitted that the petitioner was selected for the post of Teacher Grade-III. However, the petitioner was working on probation as a Consta- ble. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not relived from service for the reason that certain amount was due to be paid by the petitioner towards training. Further, it is submitted that the petitioner is willing to pay the said due amount qua training. [2025:RJ-JP:14317] (2 of 2) [CW-20113/2017] Lastly, while placing reliance upon the ratio enunciated in Rajesh vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., ; S.B. CWP No. 2987/2025, decided vide order dated 04.03.2025, it is submitted that instant matter has akin factual matrix and legal issues as that in above cited, therefore, the same can be decided in light of the ratio encapsulated therein. Learned counsel for the respondents has raised no objection to the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Howsoever, it is submitted that, if amount due towards training is deposited by the petitioner or undertaking is given qua the same, relieving order will be issued within a period of three days thereafter. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs respondents No. 5 and 6 to consider the candidature of the petitioner, if found eligible on merit, and it is made clear that on account of relieving order, candidature of the petitioner should not be rejected. Further, concerned respondent is directed to issue relieving order qua the petitioner, within seven days of submitting/depositing an undertaking/due amount. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with the aforemen- tioned. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Neeru/360