- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11320 WP No. 19341 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 19341 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. DR. VIPOOL MALKAN S/O MR. H.P.MALKAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.123, RMV EXTENSION, 2ND STAGE, 1ST BLOCK, 3RD MAIN, DOLLAR COLONY, BANGALORE - 560 094 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARUDRAPPA SHETKAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, WEST ZONE, SAMPIGE ROAD, OPP MANTRI MALL, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. 2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, WEST ZONE, SAMPIGE ROAD, OPP MANTRI MALL, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11320 WP No. 19341 of 2024 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, WEST ZONE, SAMPIGE ROAD, OPP MANTRI MALL, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. 4. SMT. KANNEGANTI RAMALAKSHMI NO.23, 1ST MAIN ROAD, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION, BENSON TOWN BANGALORE - 560 046. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MULLUR SHANTA BALAPPA., ADV. FOR R1 TO R3; SRI G.K. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R- 1 TO 3 TO TAKE SUITABLE ACTION AGAINST THE ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION PUT UP BY R-4 BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION AT ANNEXURES-F AND F1 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as follows: "In view of removal of projections of the constructions by the 4th respondent towards the petitioner's property and also in view of the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11320 WP No. 19341 of 2024 undertaking given by 4th respondent that she shall not put up any construction in the setback left between her property and that of the petitioner's property in future, the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the above petition anymore. It is therefore prayed that the above petition may be disposed of as not pressed reserving the liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate legal recourse before this Hon'ble court or any other appropriate court of law in the event the 4th respondent violates the present understanding, in the ends of justice and equity." In view of the memo filed, petition is dismissed as not pressed, liberty as sought for is reserved. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP