SURESH CHAND SHARMA S/O SHRI RADHEY SHYAM @ MOLA v. ALOK PRESENTLY POSTED AS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
CCP/1695/2018 · 2025-03-27
Uma Shanker Vyas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29824 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29824 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1695/2018
1. Suresh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Radhey Shyam @ Mola, R/o Village Patonda Tehsil Hindaun City District Karauli
2. Smt. Kunti W/o Sh. Suresh Chand Sharma, R/o Village Patonda Tehsil Hindaun City District Karauli ----Petitioners Versus
1. Alok Presently Posted As The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department Govt. Of Raj. Secretariat Jaipur
2. Pradeed Mittal Presently Posted As The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Development Corporation Setu Bhawan Jawahar Nagar Jaipur
3. Lalit Kumar Presently Posted As The Executive Engineer, Rajasthan State Road Development Corporation Hindaun City District Karauli
4. Lalit Kumar Sharma Presently Posted As The Project Director, R.S.R.D.C Ltd. Kyarda Road (In The Farm House Of Prahlad Singh Thakur) Hindaun City District Karauli
5. State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department Govt. Of Raj. Secretariat Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Rajesh Parashar.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Order 08/10/2018 Mr.Rajesh Parashar, counsel for the petitioner at the outset fairly submitted that an appeal (DB Special Appeal Writ No.780/2018) has been filed against the order dated 30.4.2018
(2 of 2) [CCP-1695/2018] passed in SBCWP No.11371/2017 of which contempt is alleged. In the aforesaid DB Special Appeal Writ No.780/2018 titled MDRSRTC & others vs. Suresh Chand Sharma & Others, interim order dated 3.10.2018 has been passed, directing the amount of compensation in dispute to be deposited with a Nationalized Bank in the form of fixed deposit. He submitted that in the circumstances this contempt petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid, this contempt petition stands
disposed of accordingly. Notices are discharged. The petitioner shall however be at liberty to move an application for revival of this contempt petition subsequent to the decision in DB Special Appeal (Writ) No.780/2018 or vacation/ modification of the interim order dated 3.10.2018.
(ALOK SHARMA), J Himanshu/40