IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19275 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Ravinder Singh …….Petitioner Versus The CSKHPKV and Another ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. R.S. Jagota, proxy counsel, for Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Precisely, the grouse of the petitioner, as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by learned counsel representing the petitioner is that though petitioner herein has been granted work charge status on notional basis in terms of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Surajmani’s case, but till date, his pay has not been refixed. 2. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, fairly states that order of pay fixation of the petitioner, if not already issued, shall be issued expeditiously. 3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by the learned counsel representing the respondents, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that the order 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 of pay fixation, if not already passed, is issued expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 08, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)