Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7363 WP No. 19755 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 19755 OF 2021 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SUNIL KUMAR S/O S.T.ERAPAJJI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, NARALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, PERIYAPATANA TALUK, MYSURU-571 107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SARAVANA.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE BY PERIYAPATNA POLICE STATION, MYSURU, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P., HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HUNSUR SUB DIVISION, HUNSUR, MYSORE-571 105.
3.
POLICE INSPECTOR, PERIYAPATTANA, PERIYAPATTANA POLICE STATION, MYSURU-571 108.
4. MANJU, S/O RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HITTANAHALLI VILLAGE,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7363 WP No. 19755 of 2021
RAVANDURU HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 108.
5. RAJAPPA S/O LATE VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT HITTANAHALLI VILLAGE, RAVANDURU HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU-571 108.
6. SHIVAMMA W/O RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HITTANAHALLI VILLAGE, RAVANDURU HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU-571 108. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 TO 3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Saravana.S., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7363 WP No. 19755 of 2021
may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12