1 2025:CGHC:29353 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6310 of 2025 1 - Smt. Rukmani Ogre W/o Shri Ramhari Miri Aged About 37 Years Occupation Rasoiya/ Dainik Majdur Govt Primatrix Scheduled Caste Girls Hostel, Hardi/ Jarve, R/o Village Hardi, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Aadim Jati And Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner, Aadim Jati And Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Raipur Distrct Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Assistant Commissioner, Aadiwasi Vikas, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate. For State- Respondents : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 01-07-2025 1. The limited grievance that the petitioner have in the instant case is the action on the part of the respondents in discontinuing the services of petitioner. 2. According to the counsel for petitioner, she was working as daily wage employee under the respondents and suddenly, the services of the petitioner was discontinued. Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 3. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instruction to state that there is availability of work in the department and they are also in need of daily wage employees, however, ignoring the claim of petitioner for said work they are appointing third persons against the said post. 4. The only prayer that the petitioner make at this juncture is that, if at all, if the respondents intend to engage daily wage workers, let the petitioner be given some preferential right and to be continued instead of appointing fresh personnel. The respondents be directed to take work from the petitioner considering her experience and the length of service rendered by her. 5. Given the said grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition at this juncture is disposed of directing the respondents 2 to 4 to look into the grievance of petitioner and try to redress the same as far as possible by reengaging the petitioner, if at all if the State or the respondents intend to get work from the daily wage workers. Under such circumstances, the petitioner be given due weightage for the services that she had already rendered in the past, after verifying the record. 6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil