IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15693/2025 Decided on: 31.10.2025 Sunil Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation at Annexure P-5 seeking applicability of Ranjit Singh & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWP No. 2500 of 2021, decided a/w connected matters on 07.07.2023 2 within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 31st October, 2025(rohit)