[2025:RJ-JP:37122] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11507/2025 Darshika Kumari Bairwa D/o Arvind Kumar Varma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Khedla, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli At Present P.g. House No. E-663, Lalkothi Scheme, Police Station Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11508/2025 V.p. Singh Gurjar S/o Pyar Singh Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kakrala, Police Station, Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur Presently R/o House No. 123/336, Thadi Market, New Sanganer Road, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Presently Confined In District Jail, Jaipur.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Akash Sharma Mr. Fateh Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/09/2025 1. The present bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS are filed by the applicants-accused Darshika Kumari Bairwa D/o Arvind Kumar Varma and V.P. Singh Gurjar S/o [2025:RJ-JP:37122] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11507/2025] Pyar Singh Gurjar seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.270/2025 dated 19.08.2025 registered at P.S. Galtagate District – Jaipur City (North), for the offence under Sections 140(3), 307, 308(2), 127(2), 115(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsels for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. They also submits that the applicants undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner Darshika submitted that she is a female and she is an innocent person. He further submitted that dispute was between Kishan and Ravindra whereas present petitioner was arrayed as an accused as she is friend of Ravindra. He further submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. At last, he submitted that petitioner has completed her LLB and she has an aspiring career. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of V.P. Gurjar submitted that he was driver of vehicle which was used by accused Ravindra and he is not having any involvement. He further submitted that there was a family dispute between the Kishan and Ravindra and due to association with friend for use of vehicle, present petitioner was arrayed as an accused. [2025:RJ-JP:37122] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11507/2025] He further submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. On the basis of complaint lodged by Kishan on 19.08.2025 about incident of 18.08.2025 for kidnapping and further transfer of money on intimidation, report is registered and matter is investigated. During investigation, it has come to notice that petitioner Darshika has called Kishan to meet her at WTP where she was found sitting in a Car RJ14TG7558 and thereafter Kishan after parking his bike has also sat in a car and both have travelled to Khole Hanuman Ji and on return they were intercepted by 4-5 boys led by Ravindra brother in law of complainant. On threat and intimidation, money has been transferred to the accounts of Sonam, Suresh and Mahesh Chand and thereafter complainant was beaten. We have considered statement and also injury report. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioners. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, [2025:RJ-JP:37122] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11507/2025] therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail applications filed on behalf of applicants-accused Darshika Kumari Bairwa D/o Arvind Kumar Varma and V.P. Singh Gurjar S/o Pyar Singh Gurjar, are hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the petitioner would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /199-200