1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 551 of 2016 1 - Aakash Thakur S/o Vishwa Raj Singh Thakur, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village- Pandariya, Tahsil- Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Aakansha Thakur D/o Vishwa Raj Singh Thakur, Aged About 25 Years R/o Village- Pandariya, Tahsil- Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 3 - Mrs. Lata Thakur Wd/o Vishwa Raj Singh Thakur, Aged About 46 Years R/o Village- Pandariya, Tahsil- Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ..............Claimants, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Narottam Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 24 Years R/o Pipar Tarai, Police Station And Tahsil- Kota, Civil And Revenue District Bilapsur, Chhattisgarh Driver Of Vehicle Ashish Bus No. C.G.-10-G-0863 ................Non-Applicant No.1, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bhola Prasad Sharma S/o Late Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, Aged About 55 Years R/o Kashyap Colony, Ward No. 24, Bilaspur, Police Station City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Owner Of Vehicle Ashish Bus No. C.G.-10-G- 0863 ................Non-Applicant No.2, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - E F C O T O K I O General Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor, Galaxy Heights Near I C I C I Bank, Vyapar Vihar, Beside Sanjay Apartment, Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.09.16 17:42:20 +0530 2 District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Insurer Of Vehicle Ashish Bus No. C.G.-10-G- 0863 ................Non-Applicant No.3, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellants : None For Respondents : Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 16/09/2025 1. No one appears for the appellants despite repeated calls. 2. The matter is listed for orders on default pointed out by the Registry. 3. On 11.1.2024, 17.12.2024 and 7.7.2025 also, no one appeared for the appellants. 4. In view of the circumstance, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Gopal