Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29799 (KAR)

SMT. RAJALSKSHMI v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/35/2021 · 2025-01-15

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1514 WP No. 35 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 35 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. RAJALAKSHMI D/O M.VENUGOPAL, AGED 38 YEARS, LANGFORD ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.SURESHA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560 027. 2. SMT. NAGALAMBIKE W/O M.VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO.7, 4TH CROSS, LANGFORD ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1514 WP No. 35 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from four years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 18