IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA RFA No. 369 of 2019 Date of decision: 17.11.2025 _______________________________________________ LAC & Ors. .....Appellants Versus Sanjay & Ors. …..Respondents ________________________________________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the appellants: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General. For the respondents: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) On the last date of hearing, this Court passed the following order:- “Learned Additional Advocate General prays for and is granted one week’s further time to file amended memo of parties. It is made clear that no further opportunity shall be granted in this respect and if amended memo of parties is not filed by the next date of hearing, then the appeal shall be dismissed for want of prosecution.” 2. Today also neither the amended memo of parties has been filed nor any explanation has been putforth by learned Additional Advocate General as to why the same has 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? not been filed. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 17th November, 2025 (raman) 2