Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1361 of 2022 Lokeshwari Rathore, W/o Doj Kumar Rathore, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bhaisma, Police Chowki - Urga, Police Station Kotwali Korba, District Korba,, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - Kehar Singh S/o Fodul Singh (not mentioned in impugned order) 2 - Ram Singh S/o Sohit Ram (not mentioned in impugned order) 3 - Dev Singh S/o Sohit Ram (not mentioned in impugned order) 4 - Jai Singh S/o Sohit Ram, age (not mentioned in impugned order) 5 - Vijay Singh S/o Sohit Ram, age (not mentioned in impugned order) All above are R/o Village Bhaisma, Police Chowki Urga, Police Station Kotwali, Tehsil And District , Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Shubhank Tiwari, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Vivek Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : None. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic
e Sanjay S. Agrawal
Order on Board 18/07/2025
1. During the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to question the legality and propriety of the impugned judgment dated 27/06/2022 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) in NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.07.21 10:36:46 +0530
2 Complaint Case No.62/2013, before the learned Sessions Court under Section 372 of Cr.P.C., in view of principles laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., reported in 2025 INSC 804.
2. Having considered the aforesaid submissions of the counsel appearing for the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the above referred matter, the instant petition stands disposed of with a direction that, if the petitioner questions the impugned judgment of acquittal in appeal within a period of 30 days from today, the concerned Sessions Judge would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the appeal, in accordance with law.
3. Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned judgment and relevant documents to counsel for the petitioner after retaining the photocopy of the same and, shall remit the record to the concerned Court forthwith.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Sanjay S. Agrawal)
JUDGE Kamde