Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37660 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 8383 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar,Vinod Kumar Tirpathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. been filed to quash the order dated 16.5.2017 passed by A.C.J.M., G.B. Nagar, in Case arising out of Case Crime No. 727 of 2013, under Sections 379, 411, 482 of I.P.C., P.S. Kasna, District G.B. Nagar, whereby non bailable warrant has been issued against the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was on bail prior to issuing non bailable warrant. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed by the court without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant, direct N.B.W. has been issued.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. It is further submitted that order of the non-bailable warrant has been passed without satisfying the service of summons or bailable warrants itself and reason to believe from absconding the process of the court. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 have opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the
observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance.
Order Date :- 17.3.2025 A.P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad