Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29795 (PNJ)

SEEMA JAIN v. STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/11404/2025 · 2025-07-11

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 295 CRM-M-11404-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 Seema Jain ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA **** Present: Mr. Amit Prashar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Akhil Singh Arora, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** MANISHA BATRA , J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No.0008 dated 10.02.2025 registered under Sections 110, 115(2), 333 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Manimajra, District Chandigarh and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 18.02.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 01.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has NISHA 2025.07.15 11.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-11404-2025 -2- submitted report dated 21.04.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.0008 dated 10.02.2025 registered under Sections 110, 115(2), 333 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Manimajra, District Chandigarh and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 18.02.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE July 11, 2025 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2025.07.15 11.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document