HARI SINGH DASANA S/O SHRI AUGU SINGH DASANA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14569/2025 · 2025-09-24
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29793 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29793 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39351] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14569/2025 Hari Singh Dasana S/o Shri Augu Singh Dasana, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Jammu Ka Talab, Post Sewantri, Tehsil Garhbor, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director Primary Education Department, Bikaner.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Managment Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma with Ms. Kritika Rajawat For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 24/09/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted his application form pursuant to advertisement dated 16.12.2022 for recruitment on the post of Primary School Teacher, Grade-III Level 1st in the category of specially abled person (Locomotor Disability). He also submitted disability certificate revealing that the petitioner is having multiple disabilities in his right hand and thus, his disability was assessed more than 40% and on the basis of such certificate due to having bench mark disability as per the rules, on being selected and securing suitable
[2025:RJ-JP:39351] (2 of 2) [CW-14569/2025] place in the merit list, he is entitled for appointment. Yet, the respondents again asked the petitioner to undergo medical examination before the Medical Board constituted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after such re-examination by the Medical Board, no certificate or document was issued however, it was verbally informed to the petitioner that his disability has been assessed less than 35%.
Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is still ready to undergo another medical examination, which may be conducted by the expert doctors of AIIMS and he would abide by the result of such examination report. In the light of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.1 to constitute a fresh Medical Board comprising of experts from AIIMS, Jodhpur who shall examine and send report after assessing percentage of disability sustained by the petitioner and further action in respect of petitioner shall be taken by the respondents in accordance with law after receiving report of such fresh Medical Board. Necessary exercise is directed to be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to deposit Rs.10,000/- as expenses for constitution of fresh Medical Board.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/185