IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.93 of 2023 -------- Dr. Sachchida Nand Sharma, aged about 71 years, S/o Late Raghunath Sharma, resident of Quarter No.1057, Sector-4-C, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, Steel City, District- Bokaro. .. ... Petitioner/Reviewist Versus 1. M/s Steel Authority of India Limited through its Chairman, Ispat Bhawan, SAIL, Lodi Road, P.O. & P.S. – Lodi Road, New Delhi. 2. The Chairman & Reviewing Authority and Appellate Authority, SAIL, Ispat Bhawan, Lodi Road, P.O. & P.S. – Lodi Road, New Delhi. 3. The Managing Director & Disciplinary Authority, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, Main Administrative Building, BSAIL, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro. … … Respondents/opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR -------- For the Petitioner : Dr. Sachchida Nand Sharma-in-person For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate -------- Order No. 04/ Dated: 14th February, 2025 Mr. Dr. Sachchida Nand Sharma, party-in-person has appeared. Argument in detail has been advanced. He has submitted that he intends to withdraw this instant civil review petition but since, the question of limitation will be there before the learned Tribunal and as such some liberty may be given for consideration of issue of limitation. 2. Mr. Bibhash Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the SAIL has submitted that the provision is already available in the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 as under Section 21 thereof. The issue of limitation is required to be dealt with by the learned Tribunal, if any limitation petition will be filed wherein the learned Tribunal is having with the power to condone the delay depending upon sufficient cause as per the provision of Section 21(3) of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. It has been submitted that since the power to condone the delay is there with the learned Tribunal and as such Limitation Act is also applicable. 3. The review petitioner/reviewist can still take all the grounds regarding the pending proceeding herein for the purpose of making out a case for condonation of delay. 2 C.Rev No. 93 of 2023 4. Upon such submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent(s), the party-in-person seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this review petition. 5. Accordingly, the instant civil review petition is dismissed as withdrawn and as such disposed of. 6. Pending IAs, if any, stand also disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Navneet Kumar, J.) Basant/S.Das