Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29791 (CHH)

ADIVASI JAGRITI MANDAL SOCIETY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2706/2020 · 2025-02-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10169 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2706 of 2020 • Adivasi Jagriti Mandal Society Registered Under The Society Registration Act 1973 Through - The Secretary Adivasi Jagriti Mandal Society - Registered Office - G-11, Agroha Society, Ring Road - Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary To The Government Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Medical Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar - Police Station - Rakhi, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Director, Directorate Of Medical Education, Old Nursing Hostel, Mantralaya Campus, Raipur District - Raipur - Chhattisgarh- 492001 3. Pt Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences And Ayush University Through - The Registrar Pt Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences And Ayush University G E Road - Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. Indian Nursing Council Through - Registrar Indian Nursing Council 8th Floor, N B C C Centre, Plot No 2 Community Centre, Okhla Phase - I New Delhi - 110020 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondent No. 4 : : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/02/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as order impugned has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities and Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 the petitioner was permitted to take admission by virtue of interim order; thus, he would pray to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to revive it if cause of action subsists. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would not oppose the submission made by counsel for the petitioner. 3. Recording the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti