- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5036 WP No. 100477 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 100477 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. PANDURANGA S/O MAHABALESHWAR SHET, AGE. 78 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS / NIL, R/O. VADIRAJ COMPLEX, NEAR OLD BUS STANDS LAXMESHWAR, TQ. LAXMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG-582 116. 2. RAGHAVENDRA S/O PANDURANGA SHET AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O VADIRAJ COMPLEX NEAR OLD BUS STAND LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR DIST: GADAG-582 116. 3. VADIRAJ S/O PANDURNGA SHET AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O VADIRAJ COMPLEX NEAR OLD BUS STAND LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR DIST: GADAG-582 116. 4. SMT. RAVIKALA W/O PANDURNGA SHET AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O VADIRAJ COMPLEX NEAR OLD BUS STAND LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR DIST: GADAG-582 116. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.B.DODDAGOUDAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SUJATA ALIAS REVATI W/O. JAYARAM SHET, AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5036 WP No. 100477 of 2022 R/O. 14/3, ‘A’ CROSS, BASAPPA GARDEN, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 040. 2. SMT. ARCHANA W/O ANNAPPA RAYAKAR, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O ANNAVARAPPA KERI, GANDHI MARKET, 3RD CROSS SHIVAMOGGA-577 401. 3. SMT. DEEPA W/O RAGAVENDRA SHET AGE:36 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O SHEYASH NILAY CHITPADI, NEAR SHOB BEKARI, UDAPI-574 118. 4. SMT. GAYATRI W/O SHERAT VERNEKAR, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. 1805, SAI NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, R.P.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 040. 5. SMT. MANGALA W/O VADIRAJ RAYKAR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O VADIRAJ COMPLEX NEAR OLD BUS STAND LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR, DIST: GADAG-582 116. 6. SMT. SUDHA W/O RAGAVENDRA SHET AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O VADIRAJ COMPLEX NEAR OLD BUS STAND LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR, DIST: GADAG-582 116. 7. SMT. PREMA W/O PANDURANG RAYKAR, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O NEAR HIPPARAGI HOSPITAL PETHABAN LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR, DIST: GADAG-582 116. 8. SMT. MINAXI W/O SHRINIVAS BHAT, AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. SAGAR, TQ: SAGAR, DIST: SHIVAMOGGA-577 401. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5036 WP No. 100477 of 2022 9. SMT. KASTURI W/O RATNKAR SHET, AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O HONNAVAR, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581 334. 10. SMT. SUNITA W/O GANAPATI RAYKAR, AGE: 72 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O NO.35, AKSHYA COLONY, HUBBALLI, TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580 009. 11. NAGARAJ S/O MAHABALESHWAR SHET, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. DHARESWAR, TQ: KUMATA-581 343. DIST: UTTAR KANNADA. 12. RAMADHAS S/O MAHABALESHWAR SHET, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O DHARESWAR, TQ: KUMATA-581 343. DIST: UTTAR KANNADA. 13. SMT. RATNA W/O MANOHAR SHET, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O MANIRTNA VEGETABLE MARKET DAVANGERI, DIST: DAVANGERI-577 001. 14. SMT. RAJESHWARI W/O MANJUNATH SHET, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O NEAR ARALIKATTI UPPAR PETH, SHIVAMOGGA, TQ/DIST: SHIVAMOGA-577 201. 15. NIRMAL W/O NITYANANDA SHET, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O MAHABALESHWAR JEWELERS NEAR MAILARDEVAR TEMPLE PETBHAN LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR, DIST: GADAR-582 116. 16. TEJASWINI D/O NITYANANDA SHET, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O MAHABALESHWAR JEWELERS NEAR MAILARDEVAR TEMPLE PETBHAN LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR, DIST: GADAR-582 116. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5036 WP No. 100477 of 2022 17. PRAJWAL S/O NITYANANDA SHET, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O MAHABALESHWAR JEWELERS NEAR MAILARDEVAR TEMPLE PETBHAN LAXMESHWAR, TQ: LAXMESHWAR, DIST: GADAR-582 116. …RESPONDENTS (R2 TO 4-ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; R5-17 ARE STANDS WAIVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.S.B.Doddagoudar., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.S.B.Doddagoudar., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5036 WP No. 100477 of 2022 The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 30