MANEZA BANO AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/888/2025 · 2025-04-29
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No.:- WP(C) No. 888/2025 CM No. 2119/2025
Maneza Bano and anr
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M.K. Sharma, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K & ors
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER 29.04.2025
Mr. M.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that there is no communication obtaining from the end of the petitioners with him and as such, he intends to relieve himself from the case.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners to approach afresh in case if any threat accrues or persists to them on account of their matrimony against the parental wishes.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
29.04.2025
Naresh/Secy.
Sr. No. 11 Naresh Kumar 2025.05.01 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document