IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (235) CR No.2351 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.05.2025 Harjinder Singh …Petitioner Versus Sanjay Kumar (deceased) through his LRs and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Ravisha Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for the respondents. **** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) 1. On 22.04.2025, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the petitioner would not press the revision petition on merits and that he may be granted sufficient time to vacate the demised premises. On this limited question, let notice be issued to the respondents, for 21.05.2025. Process dasti as well. To be taken up in the urgent list. Till then, the petitioner shall not be disposed.” 2. Thereafter, on 21.05.2025, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an adjournment. Adjourned to 23.05.2025. Interim order to continue. REKHA SHARMA 2025.05.25 00:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CR No.2351 of 2025 -2- However, it is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted. 3. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present revision petition and that, therefore, she may be permitted to withdraw the same. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE May 23, 2025 Rekha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REKHA SHARMA 2025.05.25 00:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh