APHC010427422018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19921/2018 Between: Ch. Premalatha, ...PETITIONER AND The Divisional Electrical Engineer Operation and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A RAGHAVAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. . The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action for tracing and returning of the petitioners original documents submitted by the petitioner at the time of taking housing loan vide mortgage deed No.130/84 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents to take immediate action to trace the sale deed mortgaged under the mortgage Deed No.130/84 and return the same to the petitioner immediately.” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 2 4. Learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19921 of 2018 25.03.2025 Mjl /*