Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2025 DAILYLAW 2977 (PNJ)
AASHISH SARDANA AND ANOTHER v. VATIKA LTD.
RERA-APPL/202/2025 · 2026-01-28
Vikas Bahl
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2977 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2977 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
!
"# "#
1.
Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 01.09.2025 vide which the Appellate Tribunal has observed that there is deficit of amount of Rs.6,73,313/- for complying with the proviso to Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
2.
On 10.11.2025 after hearing appellant no.1 in person, $%% &
' (
₹!!"!#"$% &
₹!!#$%' & DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.01.30 17:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment
&
( )*) )*) + %,-'
&' , + %- % !'₹!"!##!,"$%' ))+ %"- & . ! ₹,!#"!""$%
& ( / & 0 &
( !1 ) &*% + , -* .,, - & ),,% -/ *- 0 -1 -* * 2"* "".)")' - * ")"))' - .+ 1 -* * ,"++",,' 0 - 1 2 -* - +""' - %&2& # 2 * +""'% %%*2 DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.01.30 17:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment
-0 -- -* *
& - -2 0 -1 -* .,, % % + & -* # * +""'" - * % * 2- % -234 &$1 -* .,, -2 34 & $ % %#-1 -* - & -2 - 0 - % -2 34 & $ % % .+ - / & %** * %- .+ & &*" #2 - -%-
# % * " % % & -#
'
5 0"- $"% * +""' % % %*2 DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.01.30 17:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment
5 6 & *" -2 - 0 - %-*
5 1%-- &*%
-
.+ &0.+% *
%2 % *% - / % 2/ & 1 * $ * # - 0 - % * 2 & - !
"#$"%& '( )* 23 7 & 89 7- 89 DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.01.30 17:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment