M/S EMM EMM CONSTRUCTION CO v. TEJVEER SINGH IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/1010/2025 · 2025-05-12
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29758 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29758 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-1010-2025 (O&M) --1-- 192 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1010-2025 (O&M) Decided on:-12.05.2025 M/s Emm Emm Construction Co. ...Petitioner.. vs. Sh. Tejveer Singh (IAS), Principal Secretary, Local Bodies Department and others ...Respondents..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. ***** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition as principal amount payable to the petitioner stands paid.
2. In view thereof, the present petition is dismissed being not pressed. Rule stands discharged. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise its grievance regarding payment of interest by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from today, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter and in SONIKA 2025.05.14 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
COCP-1010-2025 (O&M) --2-- case of any delay on the part of respondent(s), the officer(s) concerned would be liable to pay costs of Rs. 50,000/- to the petitioner from his/her own pocket.
3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
12.05.2025
(HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.05.14 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document