iN THE Fi!Ghl COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD-ESH AT THURSDAY, THE TWENTY F`:RST DAY OF AUGUST, !f'``~#T::~:;§jj_±t:.; TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL. PETmON NO: 8542 OF 2025 Bet_ween : Marisetti Nasa Prudhvi, S/a Chinna Paclma Rae, aged 26 years, Occu: Pvt Employee, R/o Pedavegi \/i"age, anc! MandaI, Eluru District. ...petitioner/A3 AND The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutori High Court at Amaravathi, Through Pedavegi PS, Eluru District. ...Respomdent Petition under section 480^ & 483 ot' BNSS, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail in Crime No.154/2025 on the file ot-Pedavegi PS F_Iuru` District. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support +thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CH.B.Fa.P.Sekhar, Adv-ocate for the Petitioner anc{ of Public ProseciltOr for Responcient, the court made the foi!owing APHCO.? 0425242025 !N THE HIGH a,a"JET eF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AM.A_RA`VAITi (Spec§a! Origiila! Jurisc!ictiom) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY I-!RST DAY-OF AUGUST TV\/a THOUSA-ND 'ANb TWENTY FIVE PRESERET THE HONOURABLE DR.JUS"CE Y.a' LAKSHMANA RAO cF3iMINAL PET!TiO'N NO.I 8542/2025 Between : Marisetti Naga Prudhvi AND I The State Of Andhra Pradesh Coumsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.CHBRP SEKHAR [3521I I..PET['"ONER/ACCUSED .,.RESPONDENT/COREPLAINANT Counsel for the Responc]en#complainant: 1. PUBHC PROSECUITOR The -Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has rJeen filed unC!er Sections 480 and 483 of the A Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity tthe BNS.S'), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner,JAccusec! No.3 on bail ,in Crime No.154 of 2025 of Pedavegi Police Station,. Eluru District7 regiStereCl against the Petitioner/Accused No.3 herein for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sa.nhita, 2023 (for brevity lthe BNSj)- .I....` {' . I I 2 I_4+€£ I uD r €`,jJllTzt 1 ;i l' # I. I ..;; i. -#.I-?I, I *`| -` I I •T_.,-.-.:i4 S Dr.YLR, J CrI.-p.No.8542 of 2025 I,-. . Bat:d 21,.o8.2025 2. I The c`a-sre of the prose6utI'On I-S tlha{ 6-;ir16~io6.2025 a{ aroun:a:-5:30 a.m., an incident occurred at pedavegi village, whI'6h was reported on th6-same day at 10:30 p.m. in his complaint] BollI-kOnda Laxmi Narayana' stated 'that he is working as a night watchman at a glass factory in pedavegi village. He further mentioned that there have been {ongstanding disputes between him and one \ + ~ china padmarao, a. resident o.i the same village. On 19.06.2025, at ab6ut-5:30 a.m., while the, complainant was returning home on his motorcJycie after co,mpleting..his duty and was passing near padmaraoJs house, ,he wa-s stopped by the accused persons. At that moment, Accused No.1 -'Padmarad, h1'S Wife/Accused No.2 Satyavati, and their son Accused No.3 Nag-a +Pruthvi, attacked 'the comp!ainan{ with an intention to kill him.-padniarad 'struck the ~| complainant on the head with an iron rod, while Naga Pruthvi anld satyavati aided him and also beat the complainant. s-ubsequentiy, the 6omplainan{'§ family' members admitted him to the Government Hospital at EI'uru, 'where' the doctors examined him, stitched the head injury, and admj{ted hiin' for t'urther treatment. .Bas;d on the complainantJs report, the sub-lnspe-c'for of police reg.istered a case and took up inveStI'gatiOn. 3. +`' Hcaar'd l6arhed counsel for the petitioner and the leamed Assistant tl Public Pros6cutor. 4. ' -Sri C-H.B.R.P. Sekhar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits t'hat -the petitioner has not committed any offence; he was falsely implicated in this case; he is sole bread winners of his faml-Iy,I he js ready to-abide any L -+ ?J Dr.YL'R, J Cri.P.No.8542 of 2025 Dated 21.08.2025 conditions to be imposed by this Court; and urged tO enlarge the petitioner On I bail. I 5. Per corfra, Ms. Akhiia Naidu, opposed in granting of bail-stating that accusation 'ls well-founded; if the petitioner is granted bail, he will repeat the same offence and urged to dismiss the bail petition. 6. Perused the record. 7. As seen from the record, this Court, while granting bail to Accused No.1 on 31.O72025, dismissed the application of the present petitioner on the ground that the investigation was not yet completed. Now, the wound certificate has been received and nearly n-!ne witnesses have been examined. The petitioner was arrested on 20.06.2025 and has been in judicial custody for the past 60 days. 8. Consic!ering the gravity and nature of the allegations leveled against the petitio.her/Accused No.3 and the period of detention undergoing by him and his .allegecl role played in the case, this Court, finc!s it reasonable and proper to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail with certain stringent -conditions. 9. ln the result, the Criminal Petition is` allowed with the following condi|lions: E2I z.Z `' 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.P.No.8542 of2025 Datecj 21.08.2025 i. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall be enlarged on bail subject to he executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousa.nd only), with tw'o sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division-Gum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of'1` Class, Eluru. ii. The Petitioner,JAccused No.3 sha!! appear before the Station House Officer, Pedavegi police s[atI`On, Eiuru District, on' - every Saturday I'n between 10:00 am and o5:00 pm, till the conclusion c>f the T`rial. iii. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 sha!! not leave the limits of the District without prior permission from the Investigating officer. iv. The Petitioner/Accused No.3 shall notcommitor indulge in similar offences in future. v. The Petit.ionelr,Accused No.3 shall cooperate with`the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall be avai!ab!e to the investigating officer as and when called by ' him] / //TRUEE COPY// AS`q:_QDi-^Nh-I¥AnG_A_lpr_¥A I sss:SCTT:oNde#:EF :!lcS::RA R - --``.`|- To, 1. The I Ac!c!itional Civil J!..idge (Junior Di`vJiSiOn)-Cwm-Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class; E!ljrLi. 2. The lsl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class: Eiuru. / 3. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, E`!uru. 4. The Station House Officer, Pedavegi Po!ice|Station, Eluru District. 5, One CC to Sri CH.B.R.i.sekhar, Advocate [OPUC] 6..Two CCs toPUBLiC |PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P., Amaravati.[OUT] 7. One spare copy. PSD i -``, ._ I * | i ` ~ i+,rlI . I.I +,-i I.i",I., : l` |_ t ¢ r/ i I,I / / P *.. I..,-.I I+ \f \. -\ |.I \-.? +~ 1 HIGH COUFaT DR.YLR,J DATE:21 /08/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.8542 of 2025 ALLOWED