IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 94 of 2014 Date of Decision : 17.11.2025 Asku Negi and others ....Petitioners Versus Dandoop Gyal Sain and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioners : Ms. Bhavya Sharma, Advocate. (Petitioners present in person) For respondents No.1 to 7 : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For respondent No.8-State : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he does not want to press the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 17th November, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.