2025:UHC:1501 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 338 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mohkam Singh and Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Virendra alias Veeru’ is in judicial custody in relation to First Information Report dated 31.12.2024 registered as FIR No. 107 of 2024 P.S. Jhankaiya, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and furthermore there is no proper compliance of provisions of Section 42, 43, 50, 55 and 57 of NDPS Act. 5. Apart from this, he submits that the chargesheet has already been filed and the applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. Apart from this, he submits that the alleged contraband, which was shown to be recovered from the applicant is below a commercial quantity 7. Learned State counsel have not disputed this fact that the chargesheet has been filed and the alleged contraband which was shown to be recovered from the present applicant is below a commercial quantity and furthermore the applicant have no previous criminal history. 8. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the applicant has no previous criminal history and the alleged contraband which was shown to be recovered from the present applicant is below a commercial quantity, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 2025:UHC:1501 10. Let the applicant ‘Virendra alias Veeru’ be enlarged on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 11. It is made clear that if the applicant is found to be indulged in any such activity in future the prosecution is directed to move immediately an application for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 04.03.2025 PR