NARESH SHARMA v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH INCHARGE POLICE STATION AKHNOOR AND ANOTHER.
CRM(M)/172/2020 · 2025-07-15
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2974 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2974 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 172/2020 c/w MCC No. 208/2019
Naresh Sharma
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Tushar Chopra, Advocate vice Mr. Jasbir Singh Jasrotia, Advocate. q
vs
UT of J&K and Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Shazia Asaf, Advocate Mr. P. D. Singh, Dy. AG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 15.07.2025
None for respondent No. 2, despite service.
Learned counsel for official respondent has produced copy of the status report, a perusal whereof, reveals that offence under Section 494 IPC has been proved against Anjali Sharma, wife of petitioner. As the said offence is non- cognizable in nature, therefore, the investigation in the present case has been closed as not “admitted”.
Status report is taken on record.
In the absence of non-cognizable offence, the present petitions along with MCC No. 208/2019 and connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
However, private respondent complainat shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to him.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 15.07.2025 Anil Sanhotra
Sr. No. 19