> APHC010425872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0? TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO thousand and TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.559 of 20?.^ Appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes , (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, passed in CRLMP.No.627 of 2025 (Cr.No.61 of 2025 of in the Special Court for Trial of Cases Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapuramu, Anantapuramu Between: A\/ r\v.ARTHI & Scheduled Tribes against the Order dated 22.07.2025 of Gooty PS) on the file under Scheduled Castes and 1989-cum-VIII Additional District. Peram Ganesh, S/o P.Lakshmanna, R/o 2-162, Konuppalapadu Village, Anantapur District Age 20 years, Occ: Auto Driver, Yadiki Mandal. ...Appellant/Petitioner/Accused No.3 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Judicature of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. High Court of .. • Respondent/Complainant 2. Sake Yogendra, S/o Chinna Masthan Operator, R/o 7-283, Gooty, Anantapur District Age 25 Years, Occ: JCB ...Respondent/De-facto Complainant ^ Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri N Chandra Sekhar Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following order: 7 «% ' APHC010425872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 559/2025 Between: 1.PERAM GANESH, S/0 P.LAKSHMANNA, AGE- 20 YEARS, OCC- AUTO DRIVER KONUPPALAPADU VILLAGE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, YADIKI MANDAL.. R/0 2-162, ...APELLANT AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI 2. SAKE YOGENDRA, S/0 CHINNA MASTHAN YEARS, OCC- JOB OPERATOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRIC AGE- 25 R/0 7-283, GOOTY, ...RESPODENT(S): Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to pleased to allow the Criminal Appeal setting aside the Order dt.22.07.2025 passed in CRLMP.No.627 OF 2025 (Cr.No.61 of 2025 of Gooty PS) on the file of IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SCFIEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT 1989 CUM VIII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ^ - 2 ANANTHAPURAMU: ANANTAPURAMU there by enlarging the Appellant/Petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail in Cr.No.61 of 2025 on the file of Gooty Police Station, Anantapur District and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of Certified Copies of Order dt.22.07.2025 passed in CRLMP.No.627 OF 2025 (Cr.No.61 of 2025of Gooty PS) on the file of on the file of IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT 1989 CUM VIII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & ANANTHAPURAMU; ANANTAPURAMU and SESSIONS JUDGE pass lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on bail by suspending the operation dt.22.07.2025 passed in of Order CRLMP.No.627 OF 2025 (Cr.No.61 of 2025of Gooty PS) on the file of on the file of IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT 1989 CUM VIII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ANANTHAPURAMU: ANANTAPURAMU and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 559 of 2025 The Court made the following Judgment: Heard Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant/A3 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. The present Appeal is filed under Section 14A of the 2. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 challenging the Order dated 22.07.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.627 of 2025 on the file of the Special Court for Trial of Cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapuramu District, Ananthapuramu. Learned trial Court under the impugned Judgment 3. dismissed the application for bail filed by the appellant/A3. It appears that subsequent to dismissal of this order, learned trial Court on the second application filed by the A1, enlarged him on bail whereas, the present petitioner/A3 filed the present appeal challenging the earlier order. 4 4. Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant/A3 would submit that as per the Wound Certificate, the injuries suffered by the victim are simple in nature. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State would submit that as on the date, investigation is almost completed. Considering the above facts and circumstances and upon perusal of the record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the appellant/A3 also be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: 6. i) The Appellant/A3 shall be enlarged on bail, on executing a personal bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two (02) sureties for a like sum each, to the satisfaction of the Special Court for Trial of Cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapuramu District, Ananthapuramu. On release, the Appellant/A3 shall appear before the learned Special Court for Trial of Cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapuramu District, ii) ■ ^-9 5 Ananthapuramu, on every fourth Saturday of the month, till disposal of the Appeal. The Appellant/A3 shall not leave the country without prior permission of the learned Special Court for Trial of Cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapuramu District, Ananthapuramu. The Appellant/A3 shall not intimidate or annoy the victim in any manner. If the Appellant/A3 violates any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation of the bail. iii) iv) V) 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT R RAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Special Court for Trial of Cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989-cum-VIII Ananthapuramu, Additional District and Sessions Judge Anantapuramu District. 2. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Gooty, Anantapuramu District. 3. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Gooty, Anantapuramu District, (by Speed Post) 4. The Station House Officer, Gooty Police Station, Anantapuramu District. 5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi[OUT] 6. One CC to Sri N Chandra Sekhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 7. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 8. Two CD Copies TK sree ■ HIGH COURT DATED:02/09/2025 JUDGMENT CRLA No.559 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL APPEAL