Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22158 WP No. 18136 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.18136 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. YOGARAJU, S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O MADARAHALLI VILLAGE MELUKOTE HOBLI, PANDAVPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571431. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JNANESH KUMAR K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560001 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE TAHSILDAR PANDAVAPURA TALUK PANDAVAPURA MANDYA DISTRICT 562159
3.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORS PANDAVAPURA TALUK, PANDAVAPURA
Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22158 WP No. 18136 of 2025
4.
THE TALUK LAND SURVEYOR PANDAVAPURA TALUK PANDAVAPURA
5.
SRI M J JAYARAMEGOWDA S/O LT. M C JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O MADARAHALLI VILLAGE MELUKOTE HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TAULK MANDYA DISTRICT 571431 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION PROHIBIT THE R-1 TO 4 TO SURVEY THE SCHEDULE PROPERTYGRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO PROHIBIT THE R-1 TO 4 TO SURVEY THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22158 WP No. 18136 of 2025
2. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to direct the respondents No.1 to 4 not to conduct survey in respect of the schedule property.
3. Heard, learned counsel appearing for the parties.
4. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate, where such a negative relief, as claimed by the petitioner, cannot be granted to prohibit the statutory authority to conduct the public duty. In that view of the matter, the writ petition requires to be dismissed.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53