Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29720 (RAJ)

JAISINGH SON OF SHRI JAGDISH JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/333/2025 · 2025-09-10

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36582-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 333/2025 Jaisingh Son Of Shri Jagdish Jat, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Keep Ka Pura, Tehsil Suroth, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Superintendent Of Police, Karauli, District Karauli (Rajasthan). 4. S.h.o. Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 5. Bhagwan Sahay Son Of Shri Heera, Resident Of Village Mohanpur, Tehsil Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) 6. Gyan Singh Son Of Jeewan, Resident Of Khedi Chandna, Tehsil Shri Mahaveerji, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar Mr. Sunni Lal Meena, CI SHO with Ms. Mamta, Mahila Constable, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 10/09/2025 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with regard to illegal detention of the corpus. [2025:RJ-JP:36582-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-333/2025] 2. Today the concerned SHO has produced the corpus before us. Admittedly, the date of birth of the corpus is 01.01.1996 and the corpus is above 18 years of age and this fact has been confirmed by counsel for the petitioner as well as by learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General. 3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has firmly stated before us that she wants to go and live with the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that the corpus is major and above 18 years of age, we permit the corpus to go and live freely at the place of her own choice. 5. In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition stands disposed off. The concerned SHO is directed to ensure that no harm is caused to the corpus while going at the place of her own choice. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Sudeepak/76-S