Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2971 (RAJ)

SHYAMSUNDAR KHATIK @ GUDDU S/O KHUBIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/450/2025 · 2025-03-18

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12285] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 450/2025 Shyamsundar Khatik @ Guddu S/o Khubiram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Khatik Mohalla, Halaina, Police Station Halaina, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP Mr. Rajneesh Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 100/2024 registered at Police Station Halena, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is contended that charge- sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant opposes the submissions made by counsel for the [2025:RJ-JP:12285] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-450/2025] petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, so also considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Shyamsundar Khatik @ Guddu S/o Khubiram shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/213