- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22568 WP No. 18114 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.18114 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI SANGANABASAYYA BELAVANTARAKANTHI S/O ADAYYA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT 21, 1ST MAIN, NEAR AYYAPPA BAKERY, BOBUSAPALYA, KENGERI POST, BENGALURU-560085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI CHIDANANDA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, KAUSHALYA BHAVANA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, NEAR DAIRY CIRCLE, HOSUR ROAD, BENGALURU-560029. 2. STATE COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING (SCVT), REP. BY ITS CONTROLLER, DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, STATE BOARD OF EXAMINATION, KAUSHALYA BHAVANA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, NEAR DAIRY CIRCLE, HOSUR ROAD, BENGALURU-560029. Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22568 WP No. 18114 of 2025 3. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, KAUSHALYA BHAVANA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, NEAR DAIRY CIRCLE, HOSUR ROAD, BENGALURU-560029. 4. BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM) JAYANAGAR DIVISION, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560070. REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BHOJEGOUDA T. KOLLER, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3; SRI SRIRANGA S., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SUMANA NAGANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 KA NI IM (VI)/JAVI/LE/SALE/HISA1/25-26/1643-47 DATED 02.06.2025 INITIATING DEPARTMENT ENQUIRY AGAINST THE PETITIONER IS AT ANNEXURE-A; DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO ISSUE THE REGULAR MARKS CARD TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE EXAMINATION HELD IN THE YEAR 2013 FOR STATE COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22568 WP No. 18114 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent has objected with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition since the petition is premature and submits that no precipitative action has been taken against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 26.06.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach this Court. 3. Memo is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court at an appropriate time, if law permits. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE MBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10