UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS v. LALITA KAUSHIK AND OTHERS
CWP/5969/2025 · 2025-05-07
Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29700 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29700 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Union Territory, Chandigarh and
Lalita Kaushik and others
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.
recorded in a separate order of even date passed in Union Territory, Chandigarh and others
07th May, 2025 vs
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 5969 of 2025
Date of Pronouncement:07 Union Territory, Chandigarh and others Versus Lalita Kaushik and others
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Ms. Madhu Dayal, Additional Standing Counsel, U. T. Chandigarh and Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Junior Panel Counsel, U. T. Chandigarh, for the petitioners ****** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. The writ petition is dismissed. For orders, see details reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in Union Territory, Chandigarh and others vs S (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)
, 2025
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5969 of 2025 (O&M) Reserved on : 04th March, 2025 Date of Pronouncement:07th May, 2025
… Petitioners
… Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Ms. Madhu Dayal, Additional Standing Counsel, Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Junior Panel Counsel, U. T. Chandigarh, for the petitioners. ****** is dismissed. For orders, see details reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in CWP No. 1922 of 2025 – Sakshi Malik and others.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)
JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
(O&M)
March, 2025
is dismissed. For orders, see details reasons –
VARINDER SINGH 2025.05.08 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this
order/judgment