Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37158] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11449/2025 Santosh Bai W/o Roopnarayan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Jhali Ji Ka Barana, P.s. Gendoli, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Lal Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 11/09/2025
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Santosh Bai W/o Roopnarayan seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.40/2025 dated 01.05.2025 registered at P.S. Gendoli, District - Bundi, for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110 and 189(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the
[2025:RJ-JP:37158] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11449/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is a female and no specific allegation is made against her in the report registered by complainant Hariom. He further submitted that as per allegation in FIR Roop Narayan has assaulted with sharp edged weapon on head of injured Babu Lal and due to injury upon head Babu Lal has expired during treatment. He further referred post-mortem report and submitted that the cause of death is head injury and same is attributed to Roop Narayan. He further referred statement of Hari Om and his mother Dwarka Bai and submitted that they have corroborated the version of FIR and attributed deadly assault to Roop Narayan. He further submitted that the allegation upon present petitioner is of assaulting Dwarka Bai (wife of deceased) who sustained simple injuries. He further submitted that there was a sudden provocation and a sudden fight but not a case of per-meditated assault. He also referred the material on record particularly the statement of witnesses and submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed and petitioner accused is in custody. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. [2025:RJ-JP:37158] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11449/2025]
6. On the basis of report registered by Hari Om on 01.05.2025 about deadly assault upon his father, mother and brother, the report is registered and during treatment injured Babu Lal succumbed to injured and his post-mortem is conducted. The cause of death is ante-mortem head injury. Dwarka Bai has sustained simple injuries. We have considered statement of Hariom and Dwarka Bai as referred by learned counsel for petitioner and also of Vishnu (brother of complainant). The attribution of deadly assault is upon Roop Narayan. The charge-sheet has already been filed. Present petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2025, and she is a female. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time.
The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused
8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Santosh Bai W/o Roopnarayan is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. [2025:RJ-JP:37158] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11449/2025] (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /179