[2025:RJ-JP:529] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 11/2022 Narendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahai Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Sirsali Vaya Chomu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary And Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department (Panchayati Raj Elementary Education), Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Elementary Education (First), Jaipur, Rajasthan Through District Education Officer. 3. Zila Parishad, Collectorate, Jaipur Through Chief Executive Officer. 4. School Development And Management Committee (Sdmc), Government Adarsh Senior Secondary School, Village Biharipura, P.s. Jalsu, District Jaipur-Ii, Through President. 5. Rajendra Kumar Kumawat S/o Shri Harinarayan Kumawat, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Dewogudha Panchayat Samiti Jalsu, Tehsil Aamer, District Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.M. Jain For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 06/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per his information the petitioner is at first position in the category of reserved/merit list. It is submitted that as on date one seat is lying vacant against the vacancy of 2018. It is further submitted [2025:RJ-JP:529] (2 of 2) [WMAP-11/2022] that the respondent is neither filing the reply nor are adjudicating the representation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter the Court grants the counsel for the petitioner a liberty to file representation within a period of 7 days from the date of passing of this order representing his grievances before the appropriate authority. Respondent no. 4 is directed to consider the representation within a period of 30 days thereafter, the same be adjudicated in the light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792) and circular dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, within the specified time. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to approach this Court in case the petitioners’ grievance still survives. Pending application(s), if any, disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /46