Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36978 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7534 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gulshan Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Priyanka Yadav,Ram Sanehi Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the impugned order, the petitioner has equally, efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal / revision, under the law. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact. In view of the above as well as the judgements of the Apex Court in United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tondon & Others [(2010) 8 SCC 110] (paragraph no. 43), Radha Krishan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others [(2021) 6 SCC 771] (paragraph no. 27.5) and Varimadugu Obi Reddy Vs. B. Sreenivasulu & Others [(2023) 2 SCC 168] (paragraph no. 36), the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, it is provided that in case the appeal is preferred within a period of 15 days from today, the same shall be entertained without raising any objection with regard to the limitation. Certified copy of the impugned orders, if any, may be returned after retaining its photostat copy. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad