1 2025:CGHC:13579-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1257 of 2022 1 - Hariprasad Vanshpal S/o Late Brijlal Vanshpal Aged About 80 Years R/o Ward No. 28, Saraswati Nagar, Ps - Balaghat Kotwali, District - Balaghat (M.P.) 2 - Anjan Bai Vanshpal W/o Hariprasad Vanshpal Aged About 77 Years R/o Ward No. 28, Saraswati Nagar, Ps - Balaghat Kotwali, District - Balaghat (M.P.) 3 - Mukul Vanshpal S/o Hariprasad Vanshpal Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 28, Saraswati Nagar, Ps - Balaghat Kotwali, District - Balaghat (M.P.) 4 - Lakshmi Vanshpal W/o Mukul Vanshpal Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 28, Saraswati Nagar, Ps - Balaghat Kotwali, District - Balaghat (M.P.) 5 - Damini Vanshpal @ Maya Wd/o Late Arvind Vanshpal Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No. 28, Saraswati Nagar, Ps - Balaghat Kotwali, District - Balaghat (M.P.) 6 - Priyanshu Vanshpal S/o Late Arvind Vanshpal Aged About 20 Years R/o Ward No. 28, Saraswati Nagar, Ps - Balaghat Kotwali, District - Balaghat (M.P.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through, Mahila Thana, Raipur (C.G.), Saradih, P.S. And Tahsil - Dabhra, District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) (Complainant And State) 2 - Pushpina Vanshpal W/o Yugal Kishore Vanshpal Aged About 35 Years R/o Pachpedi Naka, Behind Police Chowki, Raipur (C.G.) Mobile - 6264846210, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.1 /State : Mr. Shakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Shubhank Tiwari, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.03.22 14:58:09 +0530 2 Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 21.03.2025 1. Heard Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Shakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No.1 and Mr. Shubhank Tiwari, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the following prayer :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the FIR dated 14.01.2022 (Annexure P/1), as Crime No. 18/2022 by the police of Mahila Thana, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.), whereby the police has registered offence under section 498-A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3. It has been pointed out by learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 that in the present petition though the petitioners had challenged the impugned FIR, but at this stage, charge-sheet has already been submitted against them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take recourse to law. 3 5. In view of the above submission, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra