HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 967 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionists has stated at the Bar that so far as the order under challenge is concerned, the present revision has become infructuous for the reason that the impugned order was also challenged by the opposite party no. 2 before the Court of learned Sessions Judge and learned Sessions Judge after hearing the matter has remanded the same to the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, vide order dated 23.01.2024 with a direction to pass a fresh order after hearing both the parties expeditiously in accordance with law, hence no further order is required to be passed in the instant revision. 3. The instant revision is dismissed as having become infructuous in terms of above. September 23, 2025 Faridul Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Narendra Nath Tripathi, Preet Pal Singh Rathore Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Balendra Deo Misra, G.A. (Harvir Singh,J.) Bheem Shankar And 2 Others .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad