Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29682 (KAR)

SRI.PUTTAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1809/2022 · 2025-03-27

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13214 WP No. 1809 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1809 OF 2022 (KVOA) BETWEEN: SRI.PUTTAPPA S/O LATE KUNTA YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.63 B HOSAHALLI SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTHOSH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562125. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13214 WP No. 1809 of 2022 3. SRI VENKATASWAMY S/O LATE KAVERAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 4. SRI YELLAPPA S/O LATE KAVERAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 5. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE KAVERAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 6. SRI SHAMBAIAH S/O LATE KAVERAPPA 7. SRI T YELLAPPA S/O LATE THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 8. SRI CHANDRAPPA @ CHINNAPPA @ CHANNAIAH S/O PERUMALAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 9. SRI VENKATASWAMY S/O LATE PERUMALAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 10. SRI K NANJAPPA S/O LATE KAKAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 11. SMT SHANKARAMMA W/O LATE KAVERAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 12. SRI K VENKATAPPA S/O VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13214 WP No. 1809 of 2022 13. SRI PRAKASH S/O VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R3 TO 13 ARE RESIDING AT B HOSAHALLI SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. VAHEEDA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.07.2018 IN M.A.NO.52/2012 PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SITTING AT ANEKAL VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ORDER DATED 14.01.2011 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR VIDE ANNEXURE-B.GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER DATED 17.07.2018 IN M.A.NO.52/2012 PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SITTING AT ANEKAL VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ORDER DATED 14.01.2011 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR VIDE ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:13214 WP No. 1809 of 2022 ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner. The office objections, including the office objection on the Court fee to be paid, have remained unattended to over a period of two years. It is seen from the previous proceedings that the learned counsel on record for the petitioner remained absent even on the previous hearing date. This Court infers lack of interest and therefore, the petition is rejected. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB