[2025:RJ-JP:36215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11397/2025 1. Manoj Yadav S/o Shri Krishan Kumar Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bhojwas, Police Station Shekpur Ahir Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan. At Present Resident Of Sanchalak Namo Car Tour Travels Limited, Sector -10 Pratap Nagar, Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jaipur) 2. Dilip Singh Gaud S/o Shri Ramkrishan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Kemla, Police Station Nandoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan. At Present Tenant At Amit Shri- wastawa, Maruti Nagar, Sector-26, Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar with Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore & Ms. Seema Shekhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.316/2025 registered at Police Station Sodala, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 127(2) & 140(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:36215] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11397/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that false averments have been made in the FIR and version has been exaggerated in the FIR. Counsel submits that there was dispute between the parties with regard to the fair of taxi. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the material made available before me in the form of case diary; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners -(1) Manoj Yadav S/o Shri Krishan Kumar Yadav & (2) Dilip Singh Gaud S/o Shri Ramkrishan shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of [2025:RJ-JP:36215] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11397/2025] the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /137