Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29677 (RAJ)

VASUDEV SON OF SHRI DHARURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5750/2025 · 2025-09-25

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39654] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5750/2025 Vasudev Son Of Shri Dharuram, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Bich Ka Pada, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Superintemdent Of Police, Bharatpur ( Rajasthan). 4. Sho Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/09/2025 1. Petitioner is a complainant who has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in the impugned FIR No. 514/2024, registered at Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of IPC. The petitioner has alleged that a forged agreement to sell has been prepared, which is not signed by petitioner and may be used against him to deprive him of his property. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor states that investigation in the impugned FIR was carried out fairly and in accordance with law, and if it has not been completed, shall be completed shortly. 3. In view of the statement of learned Public Prosecutor, no directions are required to be issued, however, in case, petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:39654] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5750/2025] has any grievance, he is at liberty to approach before the concerned Judicial Magistrate, who has ample jurisdiction to monitor the investigation in the FIR in view of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], wherein it has been clarified that the Judicial Magistrate has powers under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to monitor the investigation so also to ensure the fair and impartial investigation, if required. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of with aforesaid liberty. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/25