IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19169 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 __________________________________________________________ Vijay Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ….Respondents __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul Singh Jagota, proxy counsel, for Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): While placing on record copy of office order dated 06.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti Division, Bharmour, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that petitioner has been relieved from duties on 06.12.2025 with the further direction to report for his duty in the office of Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti Division, Sarkaghat. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly the same is disposed of, as having rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 08, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?