IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 450 of 2025 ------ Md. Akbar Ansari @ Raju, aged about 43 years, son of Md. Kamruddin Ansari, resident of Village –Ghatkul, P.O. –Gadi Sirsiya, P.S. –Gandey, District –Giridih … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate : Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.271 of 2024 registered under sections 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in robbery in the house of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-15 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner transpired on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused – Md. Hanif Ansari to be one of the associates of him. It is further submitted that admittedly Rs.4,84,300/- cash along with silver and gold ornaments were recovered from the bore well ditch inside the house of Md. Hanif Ansari. It is next submitted that the co-accused –Md. Hanif Ansari is the nephew of the informant but the petitioner is no way related to them and the petitioner has been dragged in this case unnecessarily. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.25,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Giridih, in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.271 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-