Smt.Rupa Sundaramma, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/710/2025 · 2025-01-10
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2967 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2967 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010010312025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396]
FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 710/2025 Between:
1. SMT.RUPA SUNDARAMMA,, W/O V.CHANDRAN, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT 11-387,1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, SOCIETY COLONY, MADANAPALLE TOWN, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT AND NATIVE OF CHINTAKAYALAVARIPALLE, H/O NUTHANAKALUVA, TALAPULA MANDAL, KADIRI TALUK, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALAPULA PS, TALAPULA, KADIRI TALUK, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALAPULA MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, TALAPULA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
5. B SURENDAR REDDY, S/O B.CHINNA NARAYANASWAMY, AGE 60 YEARS, BUSINESS,R/O NAGAPPAGARIPALLE, BANDLAPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, TALAPULA MANDAL, KADIRI TALUK, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
6. B RAJA REDDY, S/O B.SURENDAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, BUSINES, R/O NAGAPPAGARIPALLE, BANDLAPALLE VILLAGE AND .
POST, TALAPULA MANDAL, KADIRI TALUK, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P VASU SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“….to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly on in the nature of mandamus by directing the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 at the instigation of Respondent No.5 and 6, not to call the Petitioner by the Respondents 3 and 4 for the purpose of interfering with an intention to evict the Petitioner towards to Petitioner lawful peaceful possession and enjoyment in the schedule Property viz., Sri Satya Sai District - Puttaparthi - Putaparthi Revenue District - Puttaparthi Sub District - Talapula Mandal - Nuthanakaluva Village sircar Dry - S.No.412 - Ac.1.38 Cents bounded by East Land of Bigari Obul Reddy, Mehaboob khan and Bigari Surendar reddy with others. West Road leading in between Nuthanakaluva to Devarapalle, North Avula voni and South Land of Mehaboob khan and others, and to pass ….
2. Heard Sri P.Vasu Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes and a direction may be given to the police not to summon the petitioner to the police station.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that police never interfered with the civil issues and the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute and not to summon the petitioner to the police station without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.01.2025 MH
113
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.710 of 2025
Dt.10.01.2025
MH