[2025:RJ-JP:37488] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11516/2025 Manoj Chauhan S/o Chavendra @ Chavindra, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Quarter No. 25/200, Sahunagar, Cement Factory, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. and Mr. Vipul Jaiman, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.357/2024 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2)(a), 78(2), 109(2), 308(2), 324(5), 326(g) and 331(7) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that other co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as well as by this Court. He argues that dispute has already [2025:RJ-JP:37488] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11516/2025] been resolved by the parties amicably. He contends that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the injured does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably; other co-accused persons have been granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as well as by this Court and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Manoj Chauhan S/o Chavendra @ Chavindra shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:37488] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11516/2025] 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-215