Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29665 (BOM)

MUJMILS RAFAT KADRI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/4729/2025 · 2025-04-07

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03-09-WPs-4725-25++++.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 3 WRIT PETITION NO. 4725 OF 2025 PRIYANKA RAJENDRA AURADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 4 WRIT PETITION NO. 4726 OF 2025 ABDUL KARIM KASIM SAB KASAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 5 WRIT PETITION NO. 4727 OF 2025 MOHAMMED IMRAN ABDUL HAI FAROOQUI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 6 WRIT PETITION NO. 4728 OF 2025 RUMAN AHEMED ABDUL GAFUR SHAIKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 7 WRIT PETITION NO. 4729 OF 2025 MUJMILS RAFAT KADRI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 8 WRIT PETITION NO. 4734 OF 2025 ASIF PASHAMIYAN ATTAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 9 WRIT PETITION NO. 4738 OF 2025 SIRAJUDDIN MOHAMMAD AASIF NABIJI 1 of 2 (( 2 )) 03-09-WPs-4725-25++++ VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS .… Mr. V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for the Petitioners in all writ Petitions Ms. D. S. Jape, Mr. A. S. Mantri, Mr. P. V. Diggikar, Mr. M. L. Sangit, AGPs for the Respondents-State Mr. Suhas B. Ghute, Advocate for Respondent No.3 .… CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATE : 07.04.2025 PER COURT :- . The learned advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, in all these Writ Petitions seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petitions with liberty to resort to the remedy and forum prescribed under the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024. 2. Leave granted. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. The appellate authority shall not refuse to entertain the appeals if it is preferred within two weeks, on the ground of delay. [ PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] HRJadhav 2 of 2