Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29663 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD BABUL @ KHURJA BABUL @ DAGIL BABUL SON OF LATE SHRI ABDUL RAJJAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11111/2024 · 2025-01-10

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1655] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11111/2024 Mohammad Babul @ Khurja Babul @ Dagil Babul Son Of Late Shri Abdul Rajjak, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Rameshwarpur, Police Station Hasnabad, District North Choice Pargana, Pashchim Bangal, Presently Tenant Of House No. 71, Eidgah, Kacchi Basti, Near Pada Mandi, Police Station Galta Gate, Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 10/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.43/2024 registered at Police Station Galta Gate, District Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) under Section 302 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the main allegation of causing death of the deceased and committing robbery of the mobile phone is against Sonu @ Yusuf Kureshi and Akil @ Peepa. It is alleged against the petitioner that he was found with the possession of a mobile phone of the deceased, apart from this, there is no other evidence [2025:RJ-JP:1655] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11111/2024] indicating the fact that the petitioner was found to be involved in causing death of the deceased. The petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and Investigating Officer is present in person. 4. Heard and perused the charge-sheet and case diary. 5. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioner was not involved in causing death of the deceased. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mohammad Babul @ Khurja Babul @ Dagil Babul Son Of Late Shri Abdul Rajjak in connection with FIR No.43/2024 registered at Police Station Galta Gate, District Jaipur City (North) shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/78