Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2716 WP No. 41506 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 41506 OF 2015 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI.P.M.PRASANNA S/O K.MAHADEVA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, DOOR NO.643, KAGGUDI VILLAGE, HITUEBEGELU POST, PEERIYAPATTANA TALUK.
MYSORE DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRAKANTHA.R.PATEL., & SR. MAHAMMED TAHIR., ADVOCATES [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THASILDHAR, PEERIYAPATTANA TALUK, PEERIYAPATTANA, MYSORE DISTRICT.
3.
SRI B.T.RAVISH S/O THAMMANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PRESIDENT, MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2716 WP No. 41506 of 2015
P.BASAVANAHALLI, PERIYAPATNA (T), MYSURU DISTRICT.
4. T.A.RAJEGOWDA S/O LATE ANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/A. P.BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, POONADAHALLI POST, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1, 2 & 4;
SRI. M.N.MADHUSUDHAN., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondents 1, 2 and 4 and Sri.M.N.Madhusudhan., counsel for respondent No.3 have appeared in person. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2015. Now we are in the month of January 2025.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2716 WP No. 41506 of 2015
The petition is pending from ten years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1