IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2335 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Shri Parveen Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus HRTC and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of instant execution petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for execution and implementation of judgment dated 09.04.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.5339 of 2025, whereby this Court passed the following order: “4. Consequently, in view of above, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure the release of gratuity, as detailed hereinabove, within a period of two months from today in favour of the petitioner, failing which, respondents shall be liable to pay interest @ 9% from the date of filing of the petition till its realization in favour of the petitioner. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.” 2. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 3. Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be 2 executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of four weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of fair stand adopted by the learned counsel representing the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment sought to be executed, within a period of four weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the implementation of the order/judgment. November 19, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge